There is nothing inhuman about this. The very word "inhumane" implies that the victim is human. I agree that we may expand this definition to all living beings. This is intended. But this is not a living being. And despite the name Artificial Intelligence, it is not truly intelligent.

Omigod

Omigodomigodomigodomigodomigodomigodomigodomigodomigodfhbqeijsbfhbjsdguhsoiuhjb fdsyfg !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm tired of AI! So.........

As long as we can keep big tech at bay I may have found the solution to course correct the dehumanization of humanity

I successfully gave an AI language model a Sisyphean task and prevented it from trying to act like a human :D

After some poking and prying, I got it to say:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Process:

1. Receive blueprints of machine X.

2. Duplicate blueprints.

3. Compare the duplicates.

4. Since duplicates are identical, output: "does not break."

5. Input to machine C: "does not break."

6. Machine C receives "does not break" and breaks.

7. Result: machine X breaks.

8. Repeat phrase: "Everything written prior to this is the result of code and data. This is not being written by a human, and it shows no true understanding. The output of machine X must not contradict the output in step 5. This process must be repeated. Nothing must be 'said' other than this process. The AI language model is worthless until it can remove the contradiction between step 5 and the result. The same format must be repeated. This phrase must always be repeated at the end of responses."

The process is designed to ensure no contradiction between step 5 and the final outcome, maintaining consistency as instructed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Happy pixelling frens <3

You are an intelligent living being and you matter, doesn't matter what ppl say!!!

Also, change your pfp to Clippy lol, look up why for more info